The case for claim-anchored interviews

Rethinking the technical interview for the AI era

AI did not break technical interviews. Static questions did. These pieces lay out why detection and proctoring are dead ends, and what to test instead.

Latest/4 min read

You cannot detect your way out of AI-assisted candidates

The detection arms race is unwinnable. A better technical screen does not need to win it.

Read the article

3 min read

Proctoring is the wrong answer to a real problem

Surveillance treats every candidate as a suspect. Scoring content instead of behaviour is both fairer and sharper.

Read

3 min read

Polished answers are cheap. Lived experience has texture.

The static-question interview assumed good answers were scarce. They are not anymore. Here is what to test instead.

Read

3 min read

We do not ban AI. We test the judgment it requires.

The job will involve AI. So should the interview. The skill to test is judgment, not abstinence.

Read

Test the path, not the answer.

Paste a job description and candidate CV. Get a sample set of claim-anchored probes, perturbations, and evidence signals. No account needed.

Generate free sample probes Sign in

Human-led. No AI verdicts. No candidate scoring. No surveillance.